Bonny Hills, NSW

Announcements

5 May 2025

Hello NatureMaprsAs we move into the cooler months and sighting counts begin to wind down our team has been working tirelessly to ensure our platform’s usability and performance. All merch has been po...


Continue reading

Improvements to data import tool (coming soon)

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara

Platform wide attribute changes

New Feature: Moderator Quick Responses!

Discussion

donhe wrote:
25 Apr 2025
Likewise A. chromatica !!

Amata paradelpha
WendyEM wrote:
24 Apr 2025
Yes, but where is the type specimen ? There is no indication that is a drawing of the type specimen of A. paradelpha. That British Museum specimen may be misidentified. The book the image came from is dated 1900. If I am reading this correctly Turner named A. paradelpha in 1905.

Amata paradelpha
donhe wrote:
24 Apr 2025
The image of A. paradelpha on LBH is a drawing by Hampson of a British Museum specimen. I think specimens that do not look like that are possibly misidentified.

Amata paradelpha
ibaird wrote:
23 Apr 2025
On the Bold (Hobern) evidence A. chromatica and A. paradelpha can be distimguided and this moth on appearance and wing pattern matches A. paradelpha on Bold (Hobern) :-
https://bold-au.hobern.net/specimens.php?taxid=321543
The image for A. paraadelpha on LBH does apparently match Bold (Hobern).
https://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/arct/paradelpha.html

Amata paradelpha
donhe wrote:
23 Apr 2025
Given the intrinsic variability of each species, I do not think we can reliably distinguish between A. chromatica and A. paradelpha in superficial photos.

Amata paradelpha
815,844 sightings of 22,231 species from 13,987 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.